Diaz-Ramos v. Hyundai Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of § 259 claim: \The [Puerto Rico] Antitrust Act explicitly states that there is no private right of action for a violation of section 259(a) . . . .\
• “A general law does not repeal a special law unless such repeal is expressly stated or clearly arises from the legislative intent.”
• \An implied repeal will . . . be found . . . where the latter act covers the whole subject of the earlier one and is clearly intended as a substitute.\ (quoting Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254, 273 (2003) (plurality opinion))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).