Cummings v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the attorney’s discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• holding that the attorney's discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• holding that the attorney’s discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• “[J]eopardy attaches . . . after a jury is empaneled and sworn in a jury trial . . . .” (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 242 Va. 1, 8 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Wadkins v. Robert Arnold, and the First Bank & Trust Company
  First Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 99×
• M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-08-20· cited 49×
• M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-01-22· cited 4×
• Wadkins v. Arnold
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-06-02
• Alex Michael Ramos v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2019-11-12

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cantrell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-10-18· cited 186×
• Evans-Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-10-20· cited 166×
• Rosser v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1933-01-12· cited 42×
• Low v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-09-11· cited 38×
• Fields v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-05-06· cited 28×
• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1991-06-07· cited 28×
• Greenwalt v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1982-12-03· cited 24×
• Hudson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-09-19· cited 11×
• Jones v. City of Lynchburg
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-09-10· cited 7×