CSX Transp., Inc. v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assertions of counsel do not fulfill the requirement of showing need and undue hardship
• quashing order granting motion to compel discovery because the record did not contain affidavits or testimony in support of the plaintiffs argument that it was unable to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means without undue hardship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).