CSX Transp., Inc. v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assertions of counsel do not fulfill the requirement of showing need and undue hardship
• quashing order granting motion to compel discovery because the record did not contain affidavits or testimony in support of the plaintiffs argument that it was unable to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means without undue hardship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-19· cited 13×
• METRIC ENGINEERING, INC. v. Small
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-16· cited 11×
• TAMPA MEDICAL ASSOCS. v. Estate of Torres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-25· cited 8×
• Falco v. NORTH SHORE LABORATORIES CORP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-19· cited 6×
• Zirkelbach Construction Inc. v. Rajan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27· cited 6×
• Seaboard Marine Ltd. v. Clark
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-16· cited 4×
• Honey Transport, Inc. v. Ruiz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-16· cited 3×
• Firstservice Residential Fla., Inc. v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-07· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Procter & Gamble Co. v. Swilley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-15· cited 25×
• Prudential Ins. v. Florida Dept. of Ins.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 10×
• Wackenhut Corp. v. CRANT-HEISZ ENTERPRISES
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-01· cited 10×
• DiMeglio v. Briggs-Mugrauer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 4×
• ITD Industries, Inc. v. Morrell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-30· cited 2×