Procter & Gamble Co. v. Swilley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no academic privilege exists in Florida and that the court was not at liberty to create such a privilege
• granting certiorari and quashing order in part, relating to required discovery of research documents in defendants' possession claimed as work product
• principle is well established in Florida that the unsworn analysis of a party’s attorney is insufficient to satisfy as proof of fact
• principle is well established in Florida that the unsworn analysis of a party's attorney is insufficient to satisfy as proof of fact
• “Absent the prescribed showing of Rule 1.280(b)(2), P & G’s work product should not have been ordered produced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).