Skip to main content
· 6/19/2003

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC v. Jones

Citations

  • 847 So. 2d 1118
  • 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462
  • 2003 WL 21401274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quashing order compelling discovery; noting trial court should have conducted in camera hearing to determine whether deposition questions elicited information protected by work product privilege
  • noting the absence of a showing of the extent of plaintiff s diligence in seeking information by other means
  • finding certiorari appropriate where court’s ruling work product discoverable based solely on assertions counsel departed from essential requirement of law and caused material harm because the disclosure of this information could not be remedied on final appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.