Skip to main content
· 5/27/2010

COLEMAN-FULLER v. State

Citations

  • 995 A.2d 985
  • 192 Md. App. 577
  • 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding it was error for police detective to testify to lay opinion that cell phone records placed defendant in vicinity of crime
  • “[Cell phone location] evidence may only be introduced through a witness qualified as an expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.