S.D. New York· 10/14/2008
Cruz v. Liberatore
Citations
- 582 F. Supp. 2d 508
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86343
- 2008 WL 4649142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “a transfer that affects a parent’s ability to spend time with and care for a child is the type of employment action that ‘could well dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.’”
- finding five incidents over “several months” not frequent or pervasive, but were severe enough to create hostile work environment
- denying summary judgment on the basis that “a transfer that affects a parent’s ability to spend time with and care for a child” could support a retaliation claim
- “[WJere [Plaintiffs] retaliation claim predicated solely on his change of schedule, he would face a difficult, if not Sisyphean, task.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stephen C. Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kassel v. City of MiddletownS.D. New York· 2017-09-28· cited 47×
- Pacheco v. New York Presbyterian HospitalS.D. New York· 2009-01-09· cited 44×
- Davis v. State of New York Department of CorrectionsS.D. New York· 2017-06-13· cited 8×
- Forsythe v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative ServicesS.D. New York· 2010-07-13· cited 7×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 3,553×
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 2,093×
- Patane v. ClarkSecond Circuit· 2007-11-28· cited 1,005×
- Yvette Cruz v. Coach Stores, Inc., David Otani, William Betts, Diane Lewis, Sara Lee Corporation, and Herve HeriveauxSecond Circuit· 2000-01-20· cited 804×
- Patterson v. County of OneidaSecond Circuit· 2004-07-15· cited 784×
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1999-06-16· cited 692×
- Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police CommissionerSecond Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 669×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.