Cruz v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court should review uncontested portions for clear error or manifest injustice
• holding that the court’s review is limited to ascertaining whether there is “clear error on the face of the record”
• holding that the court’s review is limited to ascertaining whether there is “clear error on the face of the record”
• holding that the court’s review is limited to ascertaining whether there is “clear error on the face of the record”
• holding that the court’s review is limited to ascertaining whether there is “clear error on the face of the record”
• holding that the court’s review is limited to ascertaining whether there is “clear error on the face of the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).