Memorial Hospital-The Woodlands v. McCown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the confidentiality provision of [the medical committee privilege] extends to initial credentialing by medical committees\
• holding that “the confidentiality provision of [the medical committee privilege] extends to initial credentialing by medical committees”
• holding that “documents and files generated for and by a hospital credentialing committee in its investigation and review of a physician's initial application for staff privileges are protected from discovery”
• holding that this exception means “records kept in connection with the treatment of [a hospital’s] individual patients as well as the business and administrative files and papers apart from committee deliberations”
• holding that the peer review committee privilege is not limited to peer review evaluations of ―events that have already occurred at the hospital,‖ but also extends to documents related to initial credentialing
• holding that the peer review committee privilege is not limited to peer review evaluations of “events that have already occurred at the hospital,” but also extends to documents related to initial credentialing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).