Cross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining forgery and counterfeiting are state law issues if resulting in private wrong and “not an offense committed directly against the Federal Government”
• state court had jurisdiction over Cross’s forgery charge for passing counterfeit currency because crime involved “a private wrong and not an offense committed directly against the Federal Government as in counterfeiting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McMurry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-12-14· cited 9×
• Ebenezer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-06-19· cited 8×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Escobedo v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
• Rouse v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1848-01-15· cited 17×
• Nastasi v. Aderhold
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1946-09-05· cited 5×