Skip to main content
· 6/19/1989

Ebenezer v. State

Citations

  • 383 S.E.2d 373
  • 191 Ga. App. 901
  • 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding exclusion of alleged hearsay harmless because “defendant later testified to virtually the same information”
  • trial court did not err in failing to define “defraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray, Carley, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.