Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 4/16/2019

Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.

Citations

  • 921 F.3d 617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that “proximate cause requires some ‘directness’ No. 18-6210 United States v. Pritchard Page 23 between the tortious conduct and the injury”
  • concluding plaintiffs’ allegations that ISIS “virtually recruited” the perpetrator were insufficient to establish that it “authorized” the attack at issue
  • concluding plaintiffs’ allegations that ISIS “virtually recruited” the perpetrator were insufficient to establish that it “authorized” the attack at issue
  • finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice when plaintiffs did not file a proposed second amended complaint or seek leave to do so
  • collecting cases and noting that courts “routinely dismiss” aiding-and-abetting ATA claims on that basis
  • collecting cases and noting that courts “routinely dismiss” aiding-and-abetting ATA claims on that basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Merritt, Nalbandian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.