Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 4/3/2025

Michael Salazar v. Paramount Global

Citations

  • 133 F.4th 642

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving allegations that defendant’s use of Pixel disclosed his “private video- viewing history to Facebook”
  • finding standing where Pixel 28 allegedly tracked user’s private video-viewing history
  • The definition of video tape service provider is “tether[ed] [to] the definition of ‘consumer’” and “pinpoints the relevant ‘goods or services[.]’”
  • “The statutory phrase “goods or services’” in the Video Privacy Act cannot be walled “off from the meaning imputed by the rest of the statute’s text.”
  • “[W]hen a party does not file a motion to amend or a proposed amended complaint in the district court, it is not an abuse of discretion for the district court to dismiss the claims with prejudice.” (cleaned up)
  • “[I]t remains ‘a fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.’” (quoting West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U.S. 697, 721 (2022))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.