Crosby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that State failed to connect victim’s loss of cattle to defendants’ criminal acts
• concluding that State failed to connect victim's loss of cattle to defendants' criminal acts
• restitution amount improper where cattle owners could not connect loss of cattle to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-28· cited 15×
• Ritch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-12· cited 6×
• Strickland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-04· cited 6×
• L.R.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-17· cited 6×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-12· cited 2×
• State v. Castro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 1×
• LRL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-17
• Valdez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-31
• S.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 13×
• Morel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-11· cited 11×
• House v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-04· cited 5×
• Touchton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-13· cited 5×
• Bautista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-17· cited 3×
• Deangelus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-26· cited 2×
• Paxson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-25· cited 1×