Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 694 So. 2d 836
  • 1997 WL 280068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony based on information received from non-testifying accountants and on documents the accountants examined but which were not introduced at the hearing was inadmissible to prove value
  • holding that hearsay evidence was inadmissible to prove the amount of restitution
  • reversing restitution order because testimony of the State’s witnesses “was based on information they received from an accountant who did not testify and on their examination of documents and records that were not produced at the restitution hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fulmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.