Morel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence established that some, but not all, shortages were the result of the defendants’ theft and limiting restitution accordingly
• state did not carry burden of establishing by preponderance of evidence that appellant caused victim’s damages in the amount of $16,800.00

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Delks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 13×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 10×
• Crosby v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-27· cited 9×
• Montalvo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-04· cited 7×
• Ritch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-12· cited 6×
• Strickland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-04· cited 6×
• Gilileo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-29· cited 6×
• House v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-04· cited 5×
• SHAN C DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-27· cited 1×
• CANERDAY v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fresneda v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-04-21· cited 96×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-23· cited 5×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-17· cited 3×