Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 9/10/1999

Crosby v. Paulk

Citations

  • 187 F.3d 1339
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21641
  • 1999 WL 703193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was reasonable for more than forty law enforcement officers to assist in executing an administrative search of a nightclub and to conduct identification checks for 400 club patrons
  • concluding that a similar Georgia statute satisfied the requirements of the Fourth Amendment
  • explaining that qualified immunity gives government officials “the benefit of the doubt, provided that the conduct was not so obviously illegal in the light of then-existing law”
  • remanding for the district judge to grant the defendants summary judgment based on qualified immunity and to determine whether the remaining state-law claims should be dismissed without prejudice
  • explaining that when a court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in a case originally filed in federal court, the state law claims “should be dismissed without prejudice so that the claims may be refiled in the appropriate state court”
  • explaining that when a court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in a case originally filed in federal court, the state law claims “should be dismissed without prejudice so that the claims may be refiled in the appropriate state court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Barkett, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Crosby v. Paulk

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.