Debbie Jaine Higdon v. Jerry Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a period as much as one month between the protected expression and the adverse action is not too protracted” to establish causation
• holding that, by itself, three months was insufficient to prove causation, but noting a previous holding that one month is “not too protracted”
• holding that a three month period between protected activity and adverse action, without more, was not sufficient to establish causation element
• holding that, by itself, three months was insufficient to prove causation, but noting a previous holding that one month is “not too protracted”
• concluding that three-month period between the protected activity and the adverse employment action was insufficient to establishing a prima facie case of retaliation
• holding that, by itself, a gap of three months was too long to support an inference of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).