Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 7/22/1992

Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp.

Citations

  • 505 U.S. 1233
  • 113 S. Ct. 2
  • 120 L. Ed. 2d 931
  • 1992 U.S. LEXIS 4763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that such payments would “affect the relationship between plan principals by extending coverage beyond the terms of the plan”
  • colleeting cases wherein state claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, negligence and misrepresentation of benefits were preempted by ERISA
  • collecting cases wherein state claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, negligence and misrepresentation of benefits were preempted by ERISA
  • finding preemption where health care provider sued plan administrator seeking recovery of plan benefits
  • “We are aware that preemption normally is not dependent on the availability of ERISA remedies.”
  • “A health care provider may assert an ERISA claim as a ‘beneficiary’ of an employee benefit plan if it has received a valid assignment of benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.