Steiger v. MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• psychiatrist testifying as to whether subject accident caused psychiatric disorder without including in hypothetical question the fact of pre-existing psychiatric problem
• plaintiff is entitled to present evidence on the facts that are relevant to his theory of the case
• plaintiff is entitled to present evidence on the facts that are relevant to his theory of the case
• the nature of the plaintiffs psychiatric condition at the time of the accident was a necessary element in a hypothetic question which purported to state a medical history of the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).