Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/14/2020

Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf

Citations

  • 975 F.3d 872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘A preliminary injunction . . . is not a preliminary adjudication on the merits but rather a device for preserving the status quo and preventing the irreparable loss of rights before judgment.’” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
  • “the deferential standard of 8 review applied in Trump v. Hawaii turned primarily on the Court’s recognition of the fundamental 9 authority of the executive branch to manage our nation’s foreign policy and national security 10 affairs without judicial interference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.