Skip to main content

Crews v. Crews

Citations

  • 989 A.2d 1060
  • 295 Conn. 153
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]hether provident or improvident, an [antenuptial] agreement moved on calculated considerations is entitled to the sanction of the law” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • even in family matters, ‘‘the abuse of discretion standard applies only to decisions based solely on factual determinations made by the trial court’’
  • ‘‘[i]t is settled that [q]uestions of law and mixed questions of law and fact receive plenary review’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \whether the trial court or this court thinks the [premarital] agreement was a good bargain for [either spouse] does not enter into the analysis of [its enforceability]\
  • ‘‘McHugh requires an extraordinary change in economic status and . . . the threshold for finding such a dramatic change is high’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \whether the trial court or this court thinks the [premarital] agreement was a good bargain for the plaintiff does not enter into the analysis of [its enforceability]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.