Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 177 A.3d 534
  • 328 Conn. 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, ‘‘when the facts are undisputed, determining the legal import of those facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review’’
  • noting that appellate review of Brady claims and Strickland claims is same
  • comparing standard for materiality under Brady with standard for ruling on motion for new trial
  • whether trial court correctly applied legal standard raises question of law subject to plenary review
  • ‘‘Ordinarily, when the facts are undis- puted, determining the legal import of those facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. . . . This is so even in the context of fact laden disputes ordinarily subject to a trial court’s discretion.’’ (Citations omitted.)
  • ‘‘[W]hen the facts are undisputed, determining the legal import of those facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. . . . This is so even in the context of fact laden disputes ordinarily subject to a trial court’s discretion.’’ (Citations omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Auria

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.