Skip to main content

Crenshaw v. State

Citations

  • 266 S.W.3d 257
  • 2008 WL 2929806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a mov-ant has been abandoned by post-conviction counsel, “the proper remedy is to put the movant in the place where the movant would have been if the abandonment had not occurred”
  • motion claiming abandonment by appointed counsel was filed more than two years after the motion court denied relief
  • \[A] motion court has authority to consider a motion to reopen Rule 29.15 proceedings when it is alleged that a movant has been abandoned by his counsel.\
  • addressing a Rule 29.15 motion claiming abandonment by post-conviction counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia Breckenridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.