Travis M. Stanley v. State of Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion court is compelled to dismiss late filed claims
• finding that arguments raised only in a \late-filed second amended motion\ were \time-barred\ and therefore appellate review was confined to arguments raised in the timely first amended motion
• finding that no hearing was warranted where the movant “fail[ed] to allege that he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial if counsel had not erred”
• describing Larson as holding that “an appeal of a denial of a request to withdraw a guilty plea is not allowed when the motion came before imposition of sentence because the denial is not a final order when sentence is not yet imposed”
• describing the Larson holding to be that “an appeal of a denial of a request to withdraw a guilty plea is not allowed when the motion came before imposition of sentence because the denial is not a final order when sentence is not yet imposed”
• “[T]he Schellert holding has been superseded by the current version of Rule 24.02(d)(4),” which expressly authorizes nonbinding plea agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).