Vincent U. Williams v. State of Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider an unexhausted contention that the notice to appear was defective
• holding that alien failed to exhaust claim that an NTA was defective for not specifying a date or time of the hearing
• holding that the alien failed to exhaust her claim that an NTA was defective for not specifying a date or time of the hearing
• explaining that “showing a change in personal circumstances is . . . insufficient to show a change in country conditions”
• holding that there was some evidentiary foundation for concluding that the increase in violence was not a material change, and the IJ and BIA did not abuse their discretion in denying 10 Case: 17-60021 Document: 00514552231 Page: 11 Date Filed: 07/12/2018 No. 17-60021 reopening
• applying the administrative exhaustion requirement to arguments relating to an allegedly defective notice to appear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).