Skip to main content

Creager v. State

Citations

  • 737 N.E.2d 771
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1649
  • 2000 WL 1529227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the question of whether “the loss of future child support falls within the ambit of Indiana Code section 35-50-5-3” involves a question of statutory interpretation
  • holding that there must be substantial evidence of a significant mitigating cireumstance
  • reversed restitution order for child support that would not have accrued until after sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Mathias, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.