Andrew T. Wilson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court erred in reversing ALJ’s denial of disability benefits because substantial evidence supporting ALJ’s denial existed
• holding that findings such as effectiveness of treatment, ability to perform daily activities, and limited use of pain medication can support an ALJ’s decision to discredit subjective testimony
• stating that if an ALJ discredits a claimant’s subjective testimony, the ALJ “must articulate explicit and adequate reasons for doing so.”
• requiring that “the objectively determined medical condition can reasonably be expected to give rise to” the alleged symptoms
• stating that this “standard also applies to complaints of subjective conditions other than pain”
• determining that substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s decision to discount the Plaintiff’s subjective complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).