Skip to main content

Crawford v. State

Citations

  • 840 P.2d 627
  • 1992 OK CR 62
  • 63 O.B.A.J. 2816
  • 1992 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83
  • 1992 WL 252729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing these alternatives as different \factual bas[e]s\ on which jury need not unanimously agree; explaining that jury must only be unanimous as to whether defendant committed \single crime\ of \first[-]degree murder\
  • “No testimony was elicited by either the State or the defense as to the level of suffering by the decedent,” and “no evidence was presented to show that the decedent did not die instantly as a result of the strangulation.”
  • “No testimony was elicited by either the State or the defense as to the level of suffering by the decedent,” and “no evidence was presented to show that the decedent did not die instantly as a result of the strangulation.”
  • “No testimony was elicited by either the State or the defense as to the level of suffering by the decedent,” and “no evidence was presented to show that the decedent did not die instantly as a result of the strangulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Lane, Brett, Johnson, Parks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.