Supreme Court· 2/19/1923
Cramer v. United States
Citations
- 261 U.S. 219
- 43 S. Ct. 342
- 67 L. Ed. 622
- 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- government protects rights of Indians if such rights are recognized in statute or flow from settled governmental policy
- where Indians had treaty rights to land, leasing of the land to a non-Indian defendant “by agents of the government was ... unauthorized and could not bind the government; much less could it deprive the Indians of their rights”
- where Indians had treaty rights to land, leasing of the land to a non-Indian defendant “by agents of the government was ... unauthorized and could not bind the government; much less could it deprive the Indians of their rights”
- grant to railroad did not extinguish aboriginal title
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 1,909×
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 915×
- Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 600×
- United States v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1942-01-05· cited 253×
- United States v. FornessSecond Circuit· 1942-01-20· cited 239×
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 207×
- United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2003-06-04· cited 175×
- United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 164×
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 109×
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1980-05-28· cited 91×
- United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation DistrictNinth Circuit· 1956-07-10· cited 89×
- Frank B. James v. James G. WattFirst Circuit· 1983-08-24· cited 79×
- Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.D. Rhode Island· 1976-07-16· cited 79×
- Unnamed caseFederal Circuit· 2000-04-18· cited 74×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1982-10-04· cited 70×
- State of New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationSecond Circuit· 2012-06-25· cited 67×
- United States v. DannSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 55×
- United States v. Walker River Irr. Dist.Ninth Circuit· 1939-06-05· cited 55×
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesS.D. California· 1954-07-29· cited 49×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 738×
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-04-01· cited 338×
- United States v. NiceSupreme Court· 1916-06-25· cited 157×
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court· 1889-12-09· cited 154×
- Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court· 1882-01-18· cited 136×
- Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court· 1879-11-24· cited 109×
- Green v. LiterSupreme Court· 1814-03-11· cited 106×
- Adamson v. GillilandSupreme Court· 1917-01-08· cited 100×
- United States v. WallerSupreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 71×
- La Roque v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1915-11-08· cited 37×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1913-02-24· cited 30×
- Midway Co. v. EatonSupreme Court· 1902-01-13· cited 12×
- Dubuque & Sioux City Railroad v. Des Moines Valley RailroadSupreme Court· 1883-11-26· cited 11×
- Garrison v. SampsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1860-07-01· cited 8×
- Cramer v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1921-10-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.