Supreme Court· 11/24/1879
Broder v. Water Co.
Citations
- 101 U.S. 274
- 25 L. Ed. 790
- 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1915
- 11 Otto 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that section 9 of the Act of 1866 “was rather a voluntary recognition of a pre-existing right of possession, constituting a valid claim to its continued use, than the establishment of a new one”
- water rights on public lands are rights “which the government had ... recognized and encouraged and was bound to protect”
- Court noted conduct of government encouraging development of mines and construction of canals and ditches on public domain
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court· 1899-05-22· cited 283×
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-04-26· cited 265×
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 237×
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 211×
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 166×
- Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1923-02-19· cited 144×
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court· 1935-04-29· cited 135×
- Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1922-06-05· cited 115×
- Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-02-09· cited 99×
- Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court· 1900-05-26· cited 87×
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court· 1914-10-20· cited 65×
- United States v. Walker River Irr. Dist.Ninth Circuit· 1939-06-05· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1945-09-24· cited 55×
- United States v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-29· cited 49×
- Jones v. AdamsNevada Supreme Court· 1885-04-15· cited 48×
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SandersSupreme Court· 1897-04-19· cited 46×
- Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court· 1932-02-15· cited 45×
- Rank v. KrugS.D. California· 1950-04-13· cited 43×
- Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court· 1903-08-03· cited 43×
- Hage v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1996-03-08· cited 43×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.