Skip to main content
· 4/18/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 1366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that if a claimant possesses a \stick\ in the bundle of property rights, a court must \determine[ ] whether the governmental action at issue constituted a taking of that `stick'\
  • recognizing that if a claimant possesses a “stick” in the bundle of property rights, a court must “determinef ] whether the governmental action at issue constituted a taking of that ‘stick’ ”
  • noting that the second step of the court’s analysis is “an intensely factual inquiry”
  • noting that the second step of the court’s analysis is “an intensely factual inquiry”
  • “the term ‘property1 as used in the Taking Clause includes all rights inhering in ownership, including the right to possess, use, and dispose of the property”
  • “If a plaintiff possesses a compensa-ble property right ... a court determines whether the governmental action at issue constituted a taking of that ‘stick.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.