Skip to main content

Craig v. State

Citations

  • 863 S.W.2d 825
  • 314 Ark. 585
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In proving the offense of manufacturing, the State must necessarily show the defendant has control of the controlled substance in order to manufacture it.”
  • “In proving the offense of manufacturing, the state must necessarily show the defendant has control of the controlled substance in order to manufacture it. That being so, possession of the substance is necessarily a lesser included offense of the manufacturing.”
  • “In proving the offense of manufacturing, the state must necessarily show the defendant has control of the controlled substance in order to manufacture it. That being so, possession of the substance is necessarily a lesser included of the offense of manufacturing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.