Beasley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• double jeopardy did not prohibit separate prosecutions for act that constituted both a violation of city hazardous driving ordinance and a violation of state DWI law, where different or additional elements were required for proof of each

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nesterenko v. Arkansas Board of Chiropractic Examiners
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-03-13· cited 14×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-01-06· cited 12×
• Hughes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-06-06· cited 7×
• Graham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2012-01-25· cited 7×
• Penn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-05-02· cited 4×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2009-12-16
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2004-09-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• United States v. Dixon
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
• Grady v. Corbin
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
• Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial Commission
  Supreme Court· 1932-01-04· cited 99×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-12-20· cited 29×
• Craig v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-11-01· cited 24×
• State v. Schaub
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-06-29· cited 6×