Skip to main content

Long v. State

Citations

  • 680 S.W.2d 686
  • 284 Ark. 21
  • 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding officer’s testimony that the defendant was intoxicated was admissible although it embraced the ultimate issue, since it did not mandate a legal conclusion
  • finding officer’s testimony that the defendant was intoxicated admissible although it embraced the ultimate issue, since it did not mandate a legal conclusion
  • intoxication not a violation of the \per se\ law; violation per se to drive with a blood alcohol content of .10% or more

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.