Craddock v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting expert testimony that “each of the twelve rocks of crack had been ‘individually packaged,’ indicating that the cocaine could be sold in small, individual quantities”
• upholding an obstruction conviction under subsection (C) where officers were eventually able to complete a search of the defendant’s person despite his extended struggling that kept them from doing so for three to four minutes and continued throughout the search
• removal of drugs from resisting arrestee’s anal cavity — without having to pull on bag — did not render strip search unreasonable
• removal of drugs from resisting arrestee’s anal cavity did not constitute manual body cavity search when officer did not have to pull bag out from buttocks
• upholding an obstruction conviction under subsection (C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).