Skip to main content
· 2/17/2009

Covinsky v. Hannah Marine Corp.

Citations

  • 903 N.E.2d 422
  • 388 Ill. App. 3d 478
  • 328 Ill. Dec. 35
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that contractual interpretation is a legal question, but the question of how a party was terminated under a contract is a question of fact
  • courts interpret a contract as a whole and apply the plain and ordinary meaning to unambiguous terms
  • the plaintiff argued that the defendant violated the Act by “not paying [the plaintiff] his final compensation, the sums due under the employment contract, at the time of his termination”
  • “Whether a breach of contract has occurred generally is *** a question of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karnezis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.