· 2/17/2009
Covinsky v. Hannah Marine Corp.
Citations
- 903 N.E.2d 422
- 388 Ill. App. 3d 478
- 328 Ill. Dec. 35
- 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that contractual interpretation is a legal question, but the question of how a party was terminated under a contract is a question of fact
- courts interpret a contract as a whole and apply the plain and ordinary meaning to unambiguous terms
- the plaintiff argued that the defendant violated the Act by “not paying [the plaintiff] his final compensation, the sums due under the employment contract, at the time of his termination”
- “Whether a breach of contract has occurred generally is *** a question of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karnezis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.