· 6/25/2010
Bernstein & Grazian, P.C. v. Grazian & Volpe, P.C.
Citations
- 931 N.E.2d 810
- 402 Ill. App. 3d 961
- 341 Ill. Dec. 913
- 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a party seeking to recover for breach of fiduciary duty must establish the existence of a fiduciary duty, breach of that duty, and damages proximately caused by the breach
- recognizing that a party seeking to recover for breach of fiduciary duty must establish the existence of a fiduciary duty, breach of that duty, and damages proximately caused by the breach
- vacating and dismissing a trial court’s quantum meruit award where the plaintiff presented no evidence to show the reasonable value of his work
- regardless of party’s action or inaction, appeal should never have been heard and it was “incumbent upon the justice of this court” to dismiss appeal
- “[t]he mere fact that a person benefits another is not of itself sufficient to require the other to make restitution therefor”
- regardless of party's action or inaction, appeal should never have been heard and it was \incumbent upon the justice of this court\ to dismiss appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.