Skip to main content
· 6/25/2010

Bernstein & Grazian, P.C. v. Grazian & Volpe, P.C.

Citations

  • 931 N.E.2d 810
  • 402 Ill. App. 3d 961
  • 341 Ill. Dec. 913
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a party seeking to recover for breach of fiduciary duty must establish the existence of a fiduciary duty, breach of that duty, and damages proximately caused by the breach
  • recognizing that a party seeking to recover for breach of fiduciary duty must establish the existence of a fiduciary duty, breach of that duty, and damages proximately caused by the breach
  • vacating and dismissing a trial court’s quantum meruit award where the plaintiff presented no evidence to show the reasonable value of his work
  • regardless of party’s action or inaction, appeal should never have been heard and it was “incumbent upon the justice of this court” to dismiss appeal
  • “[t]he mere fact that a person benefits another is not of itself sufficient to require the other to make restitution therefor”
  • regardless of party's action or inaction, appeal should never have been heard and it was \incumbent upon the justice of this court\ to dismiss appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.