Cottrell v. Cottrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Superior Court’s factual findings regarding the fraudulent conveyances were “supported by the record” and were “not clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Coleman v. Coleman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-07-15

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tobey v. Tobey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-01-15· cited 145×
• Wendt v. Wendt
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-09-05· cited 62×
• Mickey v. Mickey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 56×
• Wendt v. Wendt
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-20· cited 44×
• Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-16· cited 34×
• Desai v. Desai
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-02· cited 18×
• Tracey v. Tracey
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-08-15· cited 18×
• Rozsa v. Rozsa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-08· cited 16×
• Brooks v. Brooks
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-01· cited 8×
• Keith E. Simpson Associates, Inc. v. Ross
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-12-14· cited 8×
• Jacobowitz v. Jacobowitz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-10· cited 4×
• Reizfeld v. Reizfeld
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-01-04· cited 3×