Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/15/1974
Tobey v. Tobey
Citations
- 165 Conn. 742
- 345 A.2d 21
- 1974 Conn. LEXIS 1066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that collection of accrued alimony pendente lite can be enforced postjudgment if the judgment recognizes and holds the errant party accountable for the arrearage
- establishing that gross earnings is not criterion for alimony awards, but net income available to defendant should be considered
- establishing that gross earnings is not criterion for alimony awards, but net income available to defendant should be considered
- observing that ‘‘[g]ross earnings is not a criterion for awards of alimony’’ and that ‘‘[i]t is the net income . . . [that] is available . . . [that] the court must consider’’
- “Gross earnings is not a criterion for awards of alimony. It is the net income, which is available to the defendant, which the court must consider.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald, Bosdanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 149×
- Yontef v. YontefSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-11· cited 145×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-29· cited 132×
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-27· cited 117×
- Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-07· cited 114×
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-26· cited 112×
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-01· cited 71×
- Dubicki v. DubickiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-20· cited 66×
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
- Mallory v. MallorySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-05· cited 64×
- Molitor v. MolitorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-07· cited 62×
- Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-09-05· cited 62×
- Friedlander v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 51×
- Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-01· cited 51×
- Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-14· cited 50×
- Collette v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-05-08· cited 46×
- Mays v. MaysSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-22· cited 45×
- Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-29· cited 45×
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-06-13· cited 45×
- Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-05-04· cited 43×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-06-09· cited 144×
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-05· cited 116×
- Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-12-03· cited 79×
- Welch v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1884-05-28· cited 46×
- Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-07-14· cited 44×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-02-02· cited 43×
- McTigue v. New London Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-02-21· cited 41×
- Pencovic v. PencovicCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-09-20· cited 39×
- England v. EnglandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-12-18· cited 30×
- Baldwin v. MilesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-03-31· cited 30×
- Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-01-28· cited 29×
- Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORDNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-03-19· cited 29×
- Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1824-07-15· cited 29×
- Yates v. YatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-11-09· cited 28×
- Hotkowski v. HotkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-20· cited 24×
- Shrager v. ShragerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-07-08· cited 21×
- Cherniack v. Home National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1964-02-05· cited 15×
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. HurlbuttSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-12-23· cited 14×
- Appleton v. AppletonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-11-11· cited 8×
Other cases named Tobey v. Tobey
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.