Tobey v. Tobey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that collection of accrued alimony pendente lite can be enforced postjudgment if the judgment recognizes and holds the errant party accountable for the arrearage
• establishing that gross earnings is not criterion for alimony awards, but net income available to defendant should be considered
• establishing that gross earnings is not criterion for alimony awards, but net income available to defendant should be considered
• observing that ‘‘[g]ross earnings is not a criterion for awards of alimony’’ and that ‘‘[i]t is the net income . . . [that] is available . . . [that] the court must consider’’
• “Gross earnings is not a criterion for awards of alimony. It is the net income, which is available to the defendant, which the court must consider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).