Brooks v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[b]ecause it is uncertain whether the court’s financial awards will remain intact after reconsidering the issue of its lump sum alimony award consistent with this opinion today, the entirety of the mosaic must be refashioned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lynch v. Lynch
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-04-24· cited 14×
• Tuckman v. Tuckman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-22· cited 7×
• McRae v. McRae
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-31· cited 7×
• Cottrell v. Cottrell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-17· cited 3×
• Hammond v. Hammond
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-10· cited 3×
• Nedder v. Nedder
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-07-23· cited 2×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-10-13