Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Fallon
Citations
- 179 F. 293
- 102 C.C.A. 345
- 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5004
Syllabus
<p>1. Seamen (§ 29*) — Injury to Seaman — Extent of Recovery.</p> <p>A seaman, who is injured in the service of the vessel, may only recover for his wages and the expenses of maintenance and cure to the end of the voyage, or as long as he has a right to wages, whether he or the shipowners were negligent or not, except that, if the seaman’s injury is due to the personal negligence or default of the shipowners, he may recover full indemnity.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Seaman, Cent. Dig. §§ 386-194; Dec. Dig. § 29.*]</p> <p>2. Death (§ 85*) — Seamen—Action by Administratrix — Extent of Recovery.</p> <p>Where plaintiff, as administratrix, sued for the death of a seaman under Code Civ. I’roc. N. Y. § 1902, authorizing an action for wrongful death resulting from negligence, and decedent, had he lived, could have recovered in tort, the fact that he could not have recovered full indemnity did not preclude plaintiff, his administratrix, from recovering full compensation for the pecuniary injuries resulting to her from his death. '</p> <p>- [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Death, Cent. Dig. § 111; Dec. Dig. § 85.*]</p> <p>3. Executors and Administrators (§ 29*) — Appointment—Collateral Attack-Appointment of Administrator — Bonds.</p> <p>Where decedent, a resident of New Jersey, died in New York county, and had property in New York, viz., a cause of action for wrongful death, the surrogate of New York county had jurisdiction to grant letters of administration, as provided by Code Civ. Proc. N. Y. 2476; and hence, there being no fraud or collusion alleged in obtaining such letters, the administratrix’s appointment could not be collaterally attacked, in an action brought by her for decedent’s wrongful death, because she was not required to give bond.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Executors and Administrators, Cent. Dig. §§ 177-182; Dec. Dig. § 29.*]</p>
Judges: Coxe, Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- The Bouker No. 2Second Circuit· 1917-03-20· cited 125×
- Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseySecond Circuit· 1956-06-26· cited 62×
- Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorSixth Circuit· 1913-08-04· cited 48×
- Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1920-05-17· cited 42×
- Christopher v. GruebyFirst Circuit· 1930-04-11· cited 28×
- Schuede v. Zenith S. S. Co.N.D. Ohio· 1914-06-03· cited 14×
- The Transfer No. 12Second Circuit· 1915-02-09· cited 13×
- Larson v. Alaska Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1917-06-15· cited 7×
- In re Tonawanda Iron & Steel Co.W.D. New York· 1916-02-29· cited 7×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The OsceolaSupreme Court· 1903-03-02· cited 885×
- The HamiltonSupreme Court· 1907-12-23· cited 264×
- The IroquoisSupreme Court· 1904-05-02· cited 130×
- Hoes v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Court of Appeals· 1903-02-10· cited 19×
- Kenney v. LouieNinth Circuit· 1904-03-07· cited 18×
- The HamiltonSecond Circuit· 1906-06-22· cited 17×
- Coe Brass Mfg. Co. v. SavlikSecond Circuit· 1899-04-04· cited 3×
Other cases named Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Fallon
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.