Coppola v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff exceeded the court’s order granting leave to amend where the amended complaint included a new legal “theory” and the order only granted leave to amend the complaint “to refine and address the identified deficiencies” in a particular claim
• claim for declaratory relief under § 113(g)(2) is 1 dependent on a valid § 107 claim
• “When the Court granted 11 [plaintiff] leave to amend the Fourth Amended Complaint, it did so in order for [plaintiff] 12 to refine and address the identified deficiencies[.]”
• “Given these 14 considerations, [Plaintiff’s] theory will be dismissed without leave to amend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Starr v. Baca
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-07-25· cited 3,401×
• Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 2,313×
• United States v. Bestfoods
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 1,059×
• Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LP
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 806×
• Conservation Force v. Salazar
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-07-22· cited 783×
• Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-16· cited 525×
• Zixiang Li v. John F. Kerry
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-20· cited 337×
• Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-04· cited 335×
• John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-01-17· cited 294×
• HENRY A. v. Willden
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-04· cited 227×
• United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2001-09-21· cited 219×
• TELESAURUS VPC, LLC v. Power
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-10-08· cited 206×
• 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-10-03· cited 202×
• Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Jones Chemical, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2003-01-07· cited 165×
• Stein v. United Artists Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-11-03· cited 129×
• City of Colton v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-West
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-02· cited 99×
• Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-02-12· cited 81×
• Eric Mueller v. City of Boise
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-09-10· cited 79×