John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reminding that on a motion to dismiss, the facts are construed 7 in the light most favorable to plaintiff—the non-moving party, and where exhibits assert facts that 8 are in dispute, the court construes them in favor of the non-moving party
• remanding to 3 17 the district court to consider whether dismissal should have been without prejudice
• remanding to the district court to consider whether dismissal 10 || should have been without prejudice
• remanding to the district court to consider whether 18 dismissal should have been without prejudice
• remanding to the district court in order to consider a 16 || whether dismissal should have been without prejudice
• requiring “allegations of material fact” to support 26 claims on a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Maria Pena v. City of Rio Grande City, Texa
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-01-12· cited 419×
• Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Hancock Park Capital II, L.P.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-04-30· cited 177×
• Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-04-15· cited 95×
• William Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-09-24· cited 62×
• Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2014-12-23· cited 60×
• In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation
  N.D. California· 2016-05-05· cited 53×
• Shayna Lathus v. City of Huntington Beach
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-01-05· cited 48×
• James Hunter v. Page County, Iowa
  Eighth Circuit· 2024-05-17· cited 27×
• Palmquist v. Hain Celestial Group
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-05-28· cited 27×
• Campbell v. Facebook Inc.
  N.D. California· 2014-12-23· cited 24×
• Cline v. Reetz-Laiolo
  N.D. California· 2018-06-28· cited 24×
• Richard Palm v. Ladwp
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-05-10· cited 22×
• Vanhook v. Somerset Health Facilities, LP
  E.D. Kentucky· 2014-12-15· cited 22×
• Aleta Lilly v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-20· cited 20×
• Ladore v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC
  N.D. California· 2014-12-16· cited 20×
• McFarland v. City of Clovis
  E.D. California· 2016-02-17· cited 18×
• Smith v. Facebook, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2017-05-09· cited 18×
• Coppola v. Smith
  E.D. California· 2014-05-14· cited 7×
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmers Insurance
  E.D. California· 2014-05-30· cited 7×
• Coppola v. Smith
  E.D. California· 2013-11-12· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Moss v. U.S. Secret Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 3,161×
• Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-25· cited 1,798×
• Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 1,018×
• Cousins v. Lockyer
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-15· cited 714×
• Regina Warshaw and John D. Kaufman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Xoma Corporation Steven C. Mendell
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 416×
• Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 140×
• Flanagan v. Flanagan
  California Supreme Court· 2002-03-14· cited 113×
• Frio v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-08-26· cited 56×