Skip to main content

Cooper v. State

Citations

  • 45 So. 3d 490
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387
  • 2010 WL 3488706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not err in admitting records as the witness had “training and experience” in records processing, customer support, billing, and data servicing and testified how the business maintained and prepared its records
  • concluding “the dissimilarities of these cases are greater than their similarities”
  • affirming trial court’s exclusion of reverse Williams rule evidence where the “similar fact evidence” “was overly general and did not meet the ‘close similarity of facts, a unique or fingerprint type of information’ test for relevancy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damoorgian, Farmer, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.