Cooper v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The historic purpose behind the original writing rule has diminished with the technologically accurate reproductions provided by carbon paper and photographic equipment. Both legibility and reliability are substantially assured by the new processes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cabral
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-06· cited 16×
• People v. Bowman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-29· cited 12×
• Rudo v. Karp
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-10-03· cited 7×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-29· cited 2×
• Gordon v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-30· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Andresen v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
• Andresen v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
• Henson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-13· cited 86×
• Poore v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-08· cited 26×
• Green v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-05-01· cited 19×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-23· cited 18×