· 8/29/2001
Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Compagnoni
Citations
- 162 F. Supp. 2d 702
- 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2575
- 88 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5840
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imposing state law perfection requirements would create choice-of- law difficulties, frustrating objective of ensuring uniformity of ERISA administration
- wife had possessory interest in benefits once first DRO had been entered although interest was unenforceable until QDRO was obtained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilmore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.