Beamon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e think it equally apparent that each transaction was undertaken by her to appropriate the proceeds from the account for her own use even though she was not entitled to do so. The evidence thus constitutes a prima facie case of violating § 817.034(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-28· cited 2×
• Crocker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-20
• LAWYER STANLEY, JR. v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-11-17
• Lisa G. Miller v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pizzo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 112×
• Raines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-27· cited 5×
• Pineda v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-18· cited 4×