Indiana Supreme Court· 6/14/2011

Curtis v. State

Citations

948 N.E.2d 1143
2011 Ind. LEXIS 493
2011 WL 2341383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that failure to raise fundamental error regarding issue in principal appellate brief results in waiver of issue
holding that delays due to defendant’s request for a competency evaluation and motion to suppress were chargeable to defendant
holding that where the defendant “failed to allege fundamental error in his principal appellate brief, this issue is waived”
holding that “because the days that count toward the Rule 4(C) period exceed 365, the trial court should have granted Curtis’s motion to dismiss and discharge”
holding that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal
noting that parties may not raise an issue for the first time in a reply brief on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.