Skip to main content

Cook v. State

Citations

  • 544 N.E.2d 1359
  • 1989 Ind. LEXIS 316
  • 1989 WL 125024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony by a federal agent that there was no further contact with the defendant at a certain point because he “had made a request to speak to an attorney” did not constitute a Doyle violation
  • noting that an instruction which stated that “the presence or absence of motive is a circumstance which [the jury] may consider,” is a “good ... even-handed and complete” instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Pivarnik, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.